Ingest
Bring in structured findings and asset metadata from approved tools or exports. The initial product direction favors read-only inputs over invasive agents.
AttackPath AI is being built to help security teams move from a long vulnerability queue to a smaller set of defensible priorities. The core idea is simple: a finding matters more when it is exposed, reachable, connected to a valuable asset, and supported by evidence of real-world exploitation.
Prototype stage. No customer claims, certifications, or production guarantees are made on this site.
THE PROBLEM
Modern environments accumulate findings from vulnerability scanners, cloud posture tools, code scanners, identity reviews and external attack-surface checks. The hard part is not generating more findings. It is understanding which combinations of weaknesses create a realistic route to an important asset.
AttackPath AI is focused on that correlation layer: connect the weakness to the environment around it, show the path an attacker could plausibly follow, and make the reasoning visible to the analyst responsible for fixing it.
WORKFLOW
Designed around evidence first. Automation should shorten analysis, not hide the reasoning behind the priority.
Bring in structured findings and asset metadata from approved tools or exports. The initial product direction favors read-only inputs over invasive agents.
Standardize assets, findings, identities, trust boundaries and relationships so different security data sources can be reasoned over consistently.
Model reachable sequences from external exposure through identities, services and privileges to the assets that matter most.
Combine asset importance, reachability, exposure and exploitation signals into a practical queue instead of relying on severity alone.
Show the evidence behind each priority: what is exposed, what connects to what, and why the proposed fix breaks the path.
Turn path analysis into a concise remediation plan with owner, affected asset, control objective and verification step.
PRODUCT CONCEPT
| Finding | Asset | Reachability | Exploit signal | Priority | Recommended action |
|---|
The prioritization logic shown here is illustrative. Production scoring, evidence sources and connectors are still under development.
REFERENCE BASELINE
The project direction starts with analysis of exported or approved security data. No autonomous changes to customer systems are implied.
Priorities should be traceable to observable exposure, relationships, asset context and source evidence rather than opaque scores.
Attack-path analysis is intended for systems the operator is authorized to assess. The product is not designed to provide unauthorized access or exploitation.
EARLY STAGE
Share the problem, the environment, or the workflow you want to improve. Early conversations help shape the first usable release.