Independent early-stage security project

Security decisions grounded in exposure, reachability and impact.

AttackPath AI is being built to help security teams move from a long vulnerability queue to a smaller set of defensible priorities. The core idea is simple: a finding matters more when it is exposed, reachable, connected to a valuable asset, and supported by evidence of real-world exploitation.

Prototype stage. No customer claims, certifications, or production guarantees are made on this site.

Prioritization view SIMULATED DATA
Internetexternal access
API gatewaypublic endpoint
Identity serviceprivileged role
Customer DBcritical asset
01Asset context
02Attack-path reachability
03Exploit evidence
04Actionable remediation

THE PROBLEM

Severity is not the same as business risk.

Modern environments accumulate findings from vulnerability scanners, cloud posture tools, code scanners, identity reviews and external attack-surface checks. The hard part is not generating more findings. It is understanding which combinations of weaknesses create a realistic route to an important asset.

AttackPath AI is focused on that correlation layer: connect the weakness to the environment around it, show the path an attacker could plausibly follow, and make the reasoning visible to the analyst responsible for fixing it.

WORKFLOW

From isolated findings to an explainable path.

Designed around evidence first. Automation should shorten analysis, not hide the reasoning behind the priority.

01

Ingest

Bring in structured findings and asset metadata from approved tools or exports. The initial product direction favors read-only inputs over invasive agents.

02

Normalize

Standardize assets, findings, identities, trust boundaries and relationships so different security data sources can be reasoned over consistently.

03

Map

Model reachable sequences from external exposure through identities, services and privileges to the assets that matter most.

04

Prioritize

Combine asset importance, reachability, exposure and exploitation signals into a practical queue instead of relying on severity alone.

05

Explain

Show the evidence behind each priority: what is exposed, what connects to what, and why the proposed fix breaks the path.

06

Remediate

Turn path analysis into a concise remediation plan with owner, affected asset, control objective and verification step.

PRODUCT CONCEPT

Prioritize what an analyst can actually act on.

ALL EXAMPLE DATA IS SIMULATED
Example findings / not a live scan
FindingAssetReachabilityExploit signalPriorityRecommended action

The prioritization logic shown here is illustrative. Production scoring, evidence sources and connectors are still under development.

R

Read-only first

The project direction starts with analysis of exported or approved security data. No autonomous changes to customer systems are implied.

E

Evidence over confidence

Priorities should be traceable to observable exposure, relationships, asset context and source evidence rather than opaque scores.

D

Defensive scope

Attack-path analysis is intended for systems the operator is authorized to assess. The product is not designed to provide unauthorized access or exploitation.

EARLY STAGE

Have a security prioritization problem worth testing?

Share the problem, the environment, or the workflow you want to improve. Early conversations help shape the first usable release.

Email the founder